Skip to main content
Open a Pandora’s Box…
And a Trojan horse jumps out.

Three of the world’s largest software suppliers, Microsoft, Sun Microsystems and IBM have reached a compromise licensing arrangements with the Government “ reportedly saving to the public sector purse more £100 million over three years.

As many as two million desktop computers in the civil service could be affected by the three-year arrangement, which has been centrally negotiated by a public sector team led by Peter Gershon at the Office of Government Commerce (OGC).

This aggregation of public sector software needs, involving both central and local government departments, should act as a lesson to the private sector. It’s arguable that after The Health Service and Defence spending, Microsoft licensing has represented one of the public sector’s fastest growing black holes. Before the deal was reached the OGC had forecast that Microsoft’s revised licensing charges of last summer, would cost the public sector an additional £60m a year.

What's interesting about the deal outside of hard bargaining is that Sun Microsystems gets a foot in the door with Star Office and IBM (Through Lotus Development)) is in with a chance for Smartsuite.. a very slim chance! In effect, the Microsoft monopoly looks a little shaky as a consequence of this new policy of aggregation and cost justification.

If my own experience over the last six months is any litmus test of opinion, the public sector in other European countries is starting to question whether software-licensing costs are sustainable, particularly in the poorer countries. As a consequence, I suspect, it was important for Microsoft particularly to be seen to compromise, rather than IBM which is always thought to be happy to see it’s own software edge out its rival, as long as the concessions leaves it with a handful of loose change.
It’s quite possible that, as an example, what has happened in the UK will be followed by government’s elsewhere, in effect, telling Microsoft that handing Microsoft the key to the treasury and allowing it to help itself, just isn’t on the cards anymore, however ‘Special’ the relationship may be.

So with the direction set by government, here’s a radical suggestion, Why don’t the IOD and the CBI get together – God forbid – pool resources and start applying pressure where it hurts in support of cheaper and more sensible software licensing or even cheaper and more sensible software!


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …