Skip to main content
Open a Pandora’s Box…
And a Trojan horse jumps out.

Three of the world’s largest software suppliers, Microsoft, Sun Microsystems and IBM have reached a compromise licensing arrangements with the Government “ reportedly saving to the public sector purse more £100 million over three years.

As many as two million desktop computers in the civil service could be affected by the three-year arrangement, which has been centrally negotiated by a public sector team led by Peter Gershon at the Office of Government Commerce (OGC).

This aggregation of public sector software needs, involving both central and local government departments, should act as a lesson to the private sector. It’s arguable that after The Health Service and Defence spending, Microsoft licensing has represented one of the public sector’s fastest growing black holes. Before the deal was reached the OGC had forecast that Microsoft’s revised licensing charges of last summer, would cost the public sector an additional £60m a year.

What's interesting about the deal outside of hard bargaining is that Sun Microsystems gets a foot in the door with Star Office and IBM (Through Lotus Development)) is in with a chance for Smartsuite.. a very slim chance! In effect, the Microsoft monopoly looks a little shaky as a consequence of this new policy of aggregation and cost justification.

If my own experience over the last six months is any litmus test of opinion, the public sector in other European countries is starting to question whether software-licensing costs are sustainable, particularly in the poorer countries. As a consequence, I suspect, it was important for Microsoft particularly to be seen to compromise, rather than IBM which is always thought to be happy to see it’s own software edge out its rival, as long as the concessions leaves it with a handful of loose change.
It’s quite possible that, as an example, what has happened in the UK will be followed by government’s elsewhere, in effect, telling Microsoft that handing Microsoft the key to the treasury and allowing it to help itself, just isn’t on the cards anymore, however ‘Special’ the relationship may be.

So with the direction set by government, here’s a radical suggestion, Why don’t the IOD and the CBI get together – God forbid – pool resources and start applying pressure where it hurts in support of cheaper and more sensible software licensing or even cheaper and more sensible software!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…