Skip to main content
A Marriage but No Honeymoon

Last year, I very unkindly suggested that Hewlett Packard’s CEO, Carly Fiorina, be forced to watch endless repeats of the classic Monty Python ‘Dead Parrot’ sketch until she grasped that a merger with Compaq wasn’t the great idea she thought it was.

At first glance, the idea of an arranged marriage between Compaq’s Capellas and HP’s Fiorina, didn’t seem such a bad idea. After all both companies were struggling in the PC space against a highly aggressive Dell and Hewlett Packard had a hugely profitable printing and imaging business. Both companies were looking to leverage the economies of scale that would accompany a merger pooling their portfolios and simultaneously create a giant to squash Dell, rival IBM and partner with Microsoft, Oracle and Intel at the very top of the Enterprise.

As Compaq’s Capellas pointed out, a successful merger would see the industry consolidated down to five major players. The new HP/Compaq, IBM, Sun, Dell and EMC. Two of these, IBM and HP/Compaq would offer business a complete portfolio of products and services while the other three would offer only pieces of the puzzle.

Enterprise customers are increasingly demanding simplicity. They want to deal with fewer suppliers and are no longer keen on proprietary technologies. The world wants industry-standard building blocks these days rather than a mixed bag of liquorice allsorts and both Compaq and Hewlett Packard have recognised that take separately, their own portfolio isn’t enough to guarantee a place in a highly competitive and service oriented future.

What seemed like a good idea for Fiorina wasn’t a great idea in my mind, principally because these kinds of mergers rarely succeed. You only have to look at Compaq and Digital as an example of two cultures in collision. This acquisition arguably crippled Compaq. It lost its nimbleness, took its eye of the ball and let Dell lift swathes of its traditional market from right under its nose. Why should anyone think that a similar exercise with Hewlett Packard should be any more successful even if 15,000 jobs are cut as a result?

Integration takes time and a merger on this scale will be very painful indeed. The problem though, is that it’s to late to turn back. Whether it’s a good idea or not doesn’t matter anymore as both companies have come close to admitting that there is very little future in not merging, a view hardly likely to inspire great business confidence in either Compaq or Hewlett Packard. There’s no denying that both companies have some great products and good people but operationally, one needs to think of them as being like two huge cruise liners attempting to moor against each other in heavy seas. This industry moves extremely quickly and there’s a real danger that while the newly weds are busy setting up home, this new business will lose both momentum and message and opportunities will be lost forever.


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…