Skip to main content
A Marriage but No Honeymoon

Last year, I very unkindly suggested that Hewlett Packard’s CEO, Carly Fiorina, be forced to watch endless repeats of the classic Monty Python ‘Dead Parrot’ sketch until she grasped that a merger with Compaq wasn’t the great idea she thought it was.

At first glance, the idea of an arranged marriage between Compaq’s Capellas and HP’s Fiorina, didn’t seem such a bad idea. After all both companies were struggling in the PC space against a highly aggressive Dell and Hewlett Packard had a hugely profitable printing and imaging business. Both companies were looking to leverage the economies of scale that would accompany a merger pooling their portfolios and simultaneously create a giant to squash Dell, rival IBM and partner with Microsoft, Oracle and Intel at the very top of the Enterprise.

As Compaq’s Capellas pointed out, a successful merger would see the industry consolidated down to five major players. The new HP/Compaq, IBM, Sun, Dell and EMC. Two of these, IBM and HP/Compaq would offer business a complete portfolio of products and services while the other three would offer only pieces of the puzzle.

Enterprise customers are increasingly demanding simplicity. They want to deal with fewer suppliers and are no longer keen on proprietary technologies. The world wants industry-standard building blocks these days rather than a mixed bag of liquorice allsorts and both Compaq and Hewlett Packard have recognised that take separately, their own portfolio isn’t enough to guarantee a place in a highly competitive and service oriented future.

What seemed like a good idea for Fiorina wasn’t a great idea in my mind, principally because these kinds of mergers rarely succeed. You only have to look at Compaq and Digital as an example of two cultures in collision. This acquisition arguably crippled Compaq. It lost its nimbleness, took its eye of the ball and let Dell lift swathes of its traditional market from right under its nose. Why should anyone think that a similar exercise with Hewlett Packard should be any more successful even if 15,000 jobs are cut as a result?

Integration takes time and a merger on this scale will be very painful indeed. The problem though, is that it’s to late to turn back. Whether it’s a good idea or not doesn’t matter anymore as both companies have come close to admitting that there is very little future in not merging, a view hardly likely to inspire great business confidence in either Compaq or Hewlett Packard. There’s no denying that both companies have some great products and good people but operationally, one needs to think of them as being like two huge cruise liners attempting to moor against each other in heavy seas. This industry moves extremely quickly and there’s a real danger that while the newly weds are busy setting up home, this new business will lose both momentum and message and opportunities will be lost forever.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…